Free operad over a monoid object The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAn interpretation of this construction giving an operad from a bialgebra?What is the free monoidal category generated by a monoid?Unitalization internal to monoidal categoriesCorrespondence between operads and $infty$-operads with one objectCorrespondence between operads and monads requires tensor distribute over coproduct?understanding the definition of $infty$-operad of module objectsReference for “multi-monoidal categories”When is a quasicategory over $N(Delta)^op$ a planar $infty$-operad?An interpretation of this construction giving an operad from a bialgebra?$H$-space structure on coloured algebrasTwo monoidal structures and copowering

Free operad over a monoid object



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAn interpretation of this construction giving an operad from a bialgebra?What is the free monoidal category generated by a monoid?Unitalization internal to monoidal categoriesCorrespondence between operads and $infty$-operads with one objectCorrespondence between operads and monads requires tensor distribute over coproduct?understanding the definition of $infty$-operad of module objectsReference for “multi-monoidal categories”When is a quasicategory over $N(Delta)^op$ a planar $infty$-operad?An interpretation of this construction giving an operad from a bialgebra?$H$-space structure on coloured algebrasTwo monoidal structures and copowering










4












$begingroup$


Let $mathcalO$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcalO(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcalO(1)otimes mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcalO(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcalOto mathcalO'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrmOperads(M)to mathrmMonoids(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcalO_T(r) := T^otimes r.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^otimes rotimes bigotimes_i=1^r T^otimes k_ito T^otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^otimes k$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^otimes kstackrelDeltaotimes mathrmidtoT^otimes kotimes T^otimes k cong (T^otimes 2)^otimes k to T^otimes k.$$
In $mathbfSet$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:



  1. Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
    $$Tcong Totimes 1^otimes (k-1)stackrelmathrmidotimes eta^otimes (k-1)to T^otimes k.$$

  2. Obviously $mathcalO_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcalO_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago















4












$begingroup$


Let $mathcalO$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcalO(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcalO(1)otimes mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcalO(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcalOto mathcalO'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrmOperads(M)to mathrmMonoids(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcalO_T(r) := T^otimes r.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^otimes rotimes bigotimes_i=1^r T^otimes k_ito T^otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^otimes k$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^otimes kstackrelDeltaotimes mathrmidtoT^otimes kotimes T^otimes k cong (T^otimes 2)^otimes k to T^otimes k.$$
In $mathbfSet$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:



  1. Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
    $$Tcong Totimes 1^otimes (k-1)stackrelmathrmidotimes eta^otimes (k-1)to T^otimes k.$$

  2. Obviously $mathcalO_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcalO_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Let $mathcalO$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcalO(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcalO(1)otimes mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcalO(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcalOto mathcalO'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrmOperads(M)to mathrmMonoids(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcalO_T(r) := T^otimes r.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^otimes rotimes bigotimes_i=1^r T^otimes k_ito T^otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^otimes k$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^otimes kstackrelDeltaotimes mathrmidtoT^otimes kotimes T^otimes k cong (T^otimes 2)^otimes k to T^otimes k.$$
In $mathbfSet$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:



  1. Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
    $$Tcong Totimes 1^otimes (k-1)stackrelmathrmidotimes eta^otimes (k-1)to T^otimes k.$$

  2. Obviously $mathcalO_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcalO_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?









share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $mathcalO$ be an operad in the monoidal category $M$. Then $mathcalO(1)$ together with the morphisms
$$mathcalO(1)otimes mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$$
and the unit $eta:1to mathcalO(1)$ is a monoid object. Moreover, a morphism $varphi:mathcalOto mathcalO'$ of operads induces a morphism $mathcalO(1)to mathcalO(1)$ of monoid objects. Therefore, we get a forgetful functor
$$mathrmOperads(M)to mathrmMonoids(M).$$
If we work with coloured operads, we get a functor from coloured $M$-operads to $M$-enriched categories. Conversely, if $T$ is a monoid object, we can build an operad by
$$mathcalO_T(r) := T^otimes r.$$
and the structure maps
$$T^otimes rotimes bigotimes_i=1^r T^otimes k_ito T^otimes (k_1+dotsb+k_r)$$
as follows: Let $Delta:Tto T^otimes k$ be the diagonal (existence is clear if $otimes$ is the categorical product). Then
$$Totimes T^otimes kstackrelDeltaotimes mathrmidtoT^otimes kotimes T^otimes k cong (T^otimes 2)^otimes k to T^otimes k.$$
In $mathbfSet$, this just means $t(t_1,dotsc,t_k)=(tt_1,dotsc,tt_k)$.
It should be clear that this construction gives us an operad. Now two problems/questions:



  1. Does the morphism $Delta$ always exist in the general setting? It is obviously not the same as
    $$Tcong Totimes 1^otimes (k-1)stackrelmathrmidotimes eta^otimes (k-1)to T^otimes k.$$

  2. Obviously $mathcalO_T(1)cong T$, but it seems to be not true that $mathcalO_T$ is the free operad over the monoid object $T$. Is there another construction for the “free” operad over $T$?






ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









FKranholdFKranhold

3577




3577







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
    $endgroup$
    – Simon Henry
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Najib Idrissi
    1 hour ago







5




5




$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
The Free operads over $T$ is alot simpler than this: it has $mathcalO(1)=T$ and all the $mathcalO(n)$ for $n>1$ are the unit.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
1 hour ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
@SimonHenry Should $mathcalO(n)$ be initial object of the category, actually?
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
1 hour ago





2




2




$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Yes, you're right, sorry ! And one needs the tensor product to preserves the initial object in each variable, I'm not sure what happen otherwise.
$endgroup$
– Simon Henry
1 hour ago





1




1




$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@SimonHenry That's true, thanks.
$endgroup$
– Najib Idrissi
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathttCom rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathttCom$ by $T$.



  1. No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.


  2. I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathttO(1) = T$ and $mathttO(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    29 mins ago












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327871%2ffree-operad-over-a-monoid-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathttCom rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathttCom$ by $T$.



  1. No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.


  2. I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathttO(1) = T$ and $mathttO(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    29 mins ago
















6












$begingroup$

Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathttCom rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathttCom$ by $T$.



  1. No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.


  2. I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathttO(1) = T$ and $mathttO(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    29 mins ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$

Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathttCom rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathttCom$ by $T$.



  1. No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.


  2. I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathttO(1) = T$ and $mathttO(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let me mention that this is related to this earlier question of mine (which is unanswered :-( ) and more generally to semi-direct products of operads by bialgebras. You construction is the semi-direct product $mathttCom rtimes T$ of the commutative operad $mathttCom$ by $T$.



  1. No, there is no diagonal in general. You need a cocommutative bimonoid object, i.e. an object equipped with a multiplication $mu : T otimes T to T$ and a comultiplication $Delta : T to T otimes T$ such that $mu$ is associative and unital, $Delta$ is coassociative, cocommutative and counital, and they satisfy a compatibility relation $Delta circ mu = mu circ (Delta otimes Delta)$.


  2. I'll assume that by "free operad" you mean a left adjoint to the forgetful functor. Let $varnothing$ be the initial object of your category and suppose that $varnothing otimes X = varnothing = X otimes varnothing$ for all $X$. Then (as Simon Henry mentions in the comments), the free operad on $T$ is simply given by $mathttO(1) = T$ and $mathttO(n) = varnothing$ for $n neq 1$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Najib IdrissiNajib Idrissi

2,17211127




2,17211127











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    29 mins ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    29 mins ago
















$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
29 mins ago





$begingroup$
Thank you! Am I correct that you mean the compatibility $Deltacirc mu = (muotimes mu)circ (mathrmidotimes betaotimesmathrmid)circ (DeltaotimesDelta)$ where $beta:T^otimes 2to T^otimes 2$ is the symmetric braiding?
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
29 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327871%2ffree-operad-over-a-monoid-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the altitude of a satellite defined, given that the Earth is not spherical?Why do satellites appear to move faster when overhead and slower closer to the horizon?For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?Why is Nodal precession affected by the rotational period of the planet?Why is it so difficult to predict the exact reentry location and time of a very low earth orbit object?Why are low earth orbit satellites not visible from the same place all the time?Perifocal coordinates and the orbit equationHow feasible is the Moonspike mission?What was the typical perigee after a shuttle de-orbit burn?I am having trouble calculating my classic orbital elements and am at a loss on where to lookAm I supposed to modify the gravitational constant with scale and why do fps & time scale changes cause my orbit to break?How Local time of a sun synchronous orbit is related to Right ascension of ascending node?What is wrong with my orbit sim equations? How can I fix them?How to obtain the initial positions and velocities of an inclined orbit?