best way to clear all iptables rules The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InKVM bridge over bonding with multiple subnetsiptables management tools for large scale environmentiptables command to clear all existing rulesIPtables SNAT eats packetsPorts do not open after rules appended in iptablesiptables to block VPN-traffic if not through tun0Why some iptables DNAT rules don't work until reboot?iptables: POSTROUTING rule not matching with markiptables redirect packet natiptables SNAT return traffic not reaching clientsetting upsimple iptables rules to allow ssh, 80, 443 and openvpn

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

Short story: child made less intelligent and less attractive

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group

Categorical vs continuous feature selection/engineering

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

Are Newtonian Mechanics considered to be 'falsified'?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Question on an engine pulling a train

How to add class in ko template in magento2

Why did Peik say, "I'm not an animal"?

Word to describe a time interval

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Pascal records and Mathematica programming

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?



best way to clear all iptables rules



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InKVM bridge over bonding with multiple subnetsiptables management tools for large scale environmentiptables command to clear all existing rulesIPtables SNAT eats packetsPorts do not open after rules appended in iptablesiptables to block VPN-traffic if not through tun0Why some iptables DNAT rules don't work until reboot?iptables: POSTROUTING rule not matching with markiptables redirect packet natiptables SNAT return traffic not reaching clientsetting upsimple iptables rules to allow ssh, 80, 443 and openvpn



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








70















I currently have this snippet:



# flush all chains
iptables -F
iptables -t nat -F
iptables -t mangle -F
# delete all chains
iptables -X


Is there a possibility that some impervious rule will stay alive after running this?



The idea is to have a completely clean iptables config, that can be easily replaced by new ruleset (nevermind routes/ifconfig's parameters).










share|improve this question






























    70















    I currently have this snippet:



    # flush all chains
    iptables -F
    iptables -t nat -F
    iptables -t mangle -F
    # delete all chains
    iptables -X


    Is there a possibility that some impervious rule will stay alive after running this?



    The idea is to have a completely clean iptables config, that can be easily replaced by new ruleset (nevermind routes/ifconfig's parameters).










    share|improve this question


























      70












      70








      70


      28






      I currently have this snippet:



      # flush all chains
      iptables -F
      iptables -t nat -F
      iptables -t mangle -F
      # delete all chains
      iptables -X


      Is there a possibility that some impervious rule will stay alive after running this?



      The idea is to have a completely clean iptables config, that can be easily replaced by new ruleset (nevermind routes/ifconfig's parameters).










      share|improve this question
















      I currently have this snippet:



      # flush all chains
      iptables -F
      iptables -t nat -F
      iptables -t mangle -F
      # delete all chains
      iptables -X


      Is there a possibility that some impervious rule will stay alive after running this?



      The idea is to have a completely clean iptables config, that can be easily replaced by new ruleset (nevermind routes/ifconfig's parameters).







      iptables firewall






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 22 '18 at 5:22









      ivanleoncz

      4512727




      4512727










      asked Nov 11 '10 at 3:18









      kagali-sankagali-san

      63641019




      63641019




















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          95














          To answer your question succinctly, no: there would not be any "leftover" rules after flushing every table. In the interest of being thorough however, you may want to set the policy for the built-in INPUT and FORWARD chains to ACCEPT, as well:



          iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
          iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
          iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
          iptables -t nat -F
          iptables -t mangle -F
          iptables -F
          iptables -X


          Clear ip6tables rules:



          ip6tables -P INPUT ACCEPT
          ip6tables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
          ip6tables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
          ip6tables -t nat -F
          ip6tables -t mangle -F
          ip6tables -F
          ip6tables -X


          ...and that should do it. iptables -nvL should produce this (or very similar) output:



          Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
          pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

          Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
          pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

          Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
          pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





          share|improve this answer




















          • 7





            you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

            – kK-Storm
            Nov 12 '15 at 12:59



















          19














          This will correctly totally reset your iptables system to a very basic state:



          iptables-save | awk '/^[*]/ print $1 
          /^:[A-Z]+ [^-]/ print $1 " ACCEPT" ;
          /COMMIT/ print $0; ' | iptables-restore


          All policies will be reset to ACCEPT as well as flushing every table in current use. All chains other than the built in chains will no longer exist.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

            – Steven Monday
            Nov 11 '10 at 4:44






          • 3





            I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

            – Steven Monday
            Nov 11 '10 at 4:54






          • 2





            +1, interesting hack

            – Sam Halicke
            Nov 11 '10 at 5:55


















          2














          Whenever I need the firewall disabled is something like this:



          • iptables-save > iptables.bak


          • service iptables stop (i'm on fedora)





          share|improve this answer
































            0














            One can do this in 1 or 2 commands:



             $ sudo iptables-save > iptables.bak
            $ sudo iptables -F


            Result:



            $ sudo iptables -nvL
            Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3138 packets, 5567K bytes)
            pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

            Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
            pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

            Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3602 packets, 6547K bytes)
            pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





            share|improve this answer


















            • 5





              If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

              – RyanH
              May 17 '18 at 16:35


















            0














            I've had to block all connections recently what I ended up doing was



            iptables-policy INPUT DROP
            iptables-policy OUTPUT DROP
            iptables-policy FORWARD DROP


            as for saving I'd recommend the following



            Ubuntu:



            /etc/init.d/iptables save
            /sbin/service iptables save


            RedHat/CentOS:



            /etc/init.d/iptables save
            /sbin/iptables-save


            In addition to backup all current ufw rules Ive used this in the past



            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules /<BACKUP LOCATION> 
            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules ./


            I think this may be useful for future reference. Thought I would share.






            share|improve this answer
































              0














              Backups configuration to iptables_backup.conf and clean all rules.



              iptables-save | tee iptables_backup.conf | grep -v '-A' | iptables-restore


              To restore previous configuration:



              iptables-restore < iptables_backup.conf





              share|improve this answer























                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "2"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f200635%2fbest-way-to-clear-all-iptables-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                6 Answers
                6






                active

                oldest

                votes








                6 Answers
                6






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                95














                To answer your question succinctly, no: there would not be any "leftover" rules after flushing every table. In the interest of being thorough however, you may want to set the policy for the built-in INPUT and FORWARD chains to ACCEPT, as well:



                iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -t nat -F
                iptables -t mangle -F
                iptables -F
                iptables -X


                Clear ip6tables rules:



                ip6tables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -t nat -F
                ip6tables -t mangle -F
                ip6tables -F
                ip6tables -X


                ...and that should do it. iptables -nvL should produce this (or very similar) output:



                Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                share|improve this answer




















                • 7





                  you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                  – kK-Storm
                  Nov 12 '15 at 12:59
















                95














                To answer your question succinctly, no: there would not be any "leftover" rules after flushing every table. In the interest of being thorough however, you may want to set the policy for the built-in INPUT and FORWARD chains to ACCEPT, as well:



                iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -t nat -F
                iptables -t mangle -F
                iptables -F
                iptables -X


                Clear ip6tables rules:



                ip6tables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -t nat -F
                ip6tables -t mangle -F
                ip6tables -F
                ip6tables -X


                ...and that should do it. iptables -nvL should produce this (or very similar) output:



                Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                share|improve this answer




















                • 7





                  you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                  – kK-Storm
                  Nov 12 '15 at 12:59














                95












                95








                95







                To answer your question succinctly, no: there would not be any "leftover" rules after flushing every table. In the interest of being thorough however, you may want to set the policy for the built-in INPUT and FORWARD chains to ACCEPT, as well:



                iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -t nat -F
                iptables -t mangle -F
                iptables -F
                iptables -X


                Clear ip6tables rules:



                ip6tables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -t nat -F
                ip6tables -t mangle -F
                ip6tables -F
                ip6tables -X


                ...and that should do it. iptables -nvL should produce this (or very similar) output:



                Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                share|improve this answer















                To answer your question succinctly, no: there would not be any "leftover" rules after flushing every table. In the interest of being thorough however, you may want to set the policy for the built-in INPUT and FORWARD chains to ACCEPT, as well:



                iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                iptables -t nat -F
                iptables -t mangle -F
                iptables -F
                iptables -X


                Clear ip6tables rules:



                ip6tables -P INPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
                ip6tables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
                ip6tables -t nat -F
                ip6tables -t mangle -F
                ip6tables -F
                ip6tables -X


                ...and that should do it. iptables -nvL should produce this (or very similar) output:



                Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Feb 19 '17 at 4:03









                Aalex Gabi

                1227




                1227










                answered Nov 11 '10 at 5:52









                Sam HalickeSam Halicke

                4,8221934




                4,8221934







                • 7





                  you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                  – kK-Storm
                  Nov 12 '15 at 12:59













                • 7





                  you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                  – kK-Storm
                  Nov 12 '15 at 12:59








                7




                7





                you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                – kK-Storm
                Nov 12 '15 at 12:59






                you forgot about 'raw': iptables -t raw -F iptables -t raw -X

                – kK-Storm
                Nov 12 '15 at 12:59














                19














                This will correctly totally reset your iptables system to a very basic state:



                iptables-save | awk '/^[*]/ print $1 
                /^:[A-Z]+ [^-]/ print $1 " ACCEPT" ;
                /COMMIT/ print $0; ' | iptables-restore


                All policies will be reset to ACCEPT as well as flushing every table in current use. All chains other than the built in chains will no longer exist.






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:44






                • 3





                  I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:54






                • 2





                  +1, interesting hack

                  – Sam Halicke
                  Nov 11 '10 at 5:55















                19














                This will correctly totally reset your iptables system to a very basic state:



                iptables-save | awk '/^[*]/ print $1 
                /^:[A-Z]+ [^-]/ print $1 " ACCEPT" ;
                /COMMIT/ print $0; ' | iptables-restore


                All policies will be reset to ACCEPT as well as flushing every table in current use. All chains other than the built in chains will no longer exist.






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:44






                • 3





                  I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:54






                • 2





                  +1, interesting hack

                  – Sam Halicke
                  Nov 11 '10 at 5:55













                19












                19








                19







                This will correctly totally reset your iptables system to a very basic state:



                iptables-save | awk '/^[*]/ print $1 
                /^:[A-Z]+ [^-]/ print $1 " ACCEPT" ;
                /COMMIT/ print $0; ' | iptables-restore


                All policies will be reset to ACCEPT as well as flushing every table in current use. All chains other than the built in chains will no longer exist.






                share|improve this answer















                This will correctly totally reset your iptables system to a very basic state:



                iptables-save | awk '/^[*]/ print $1 
                /^:[A-Z]+ [^-]/ print $1 " ACCEPT" ;
                /COMMIT/ print $0; ' | iptables-restore


                All policies will be reset to ACCEPT as well as flushing every table in current use. All chains other than the built in chains will no longer exist.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 11 '10 at 4:11

























                answered Nov 11 '10 at 3:57









                JerubJerub

                30829




                30829







                • 1





                  Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:44






                • 3





                  I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:54






                • 2





                  +1, interesting hack

                  – Sam Halicke
                  Nov 11 '10 at 5:55












                • 1





                  Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:44






                • 3





                  I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                  – Steven Monday
                  Nov 11 '10 at 4:54






                • 2





                  +1, interesting hack

                  – Sam Halicke
                  Nov 11 '10 at 5:55







                1




                1





                Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                – Steven Monday
                Nov 11 '10 at 4:44





                Neat hack! I wouldn't depend on it though, since it's always possible that subtle changes to the save/restore format might break it. Probably best to stick to the API that the iptables tool explicitly provides, IMO.

                – Steven Monday
                Nov 11 '10 at 4:44




                3




                3





                I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                – Steven Monday
                Nov 11 '10 at 4:54





                I changed my mind: the data format is unlikely to change much any more, since it's used so widely. +1.

                – Steven Monday
                Nov 11 '10 at 4:54




                2




                2





                +1, interesting hack

                – Sam Halicke
                Nov 11 '10 at 5:55





                +1, interesting hack

                – Sam Halicke
                Nov 11 '10 at 5:55











                2














                Whenever I need the firewall disabled is something like this:



                • iptables-save > iptables.bak


                • service iptables stop (i'm on fedora)





                share|improve this answer





























                  2














                  Whenever I need the firewall disabled is something like this:



                  • iptables-save > iptables.bak


                  • service iptables stop (i'm on fedora)





                  share|improve this answer



























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Whenever I need the firewall disabled is something like this:



                    • iptables-save > iptables.bak


                    • service iptables stop (i'm on fedora)





                    share|improve this answer















                    Whenever I need the firewall disabled is something like this:



                    • iptables-save > iptables.bak


                    • service iptables stop (i'm on fedora)






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 6 '17 at 3:38









                    nhed

                    2711412




                    2711412










                    answered Nov 11 '10 at 5:13









                    Realn0wheremanRealn0whereman

                    1334




                    1334





















                        0














                        One can do this in 1 or 2 commands:



                         $ sudo iptables-save > iptables.bak
                        $ sudo iptables -F


                        Result:



                        $ sudo iptables -nvL
                        Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3138 packets, 5567K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3602 packets, 6547K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 5





                          If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                          – RyanH
                          May 17 '18 at 16:35















                        0














                        One can do this in 1 or 2 commands:



                         $ sudo iptables-save > iptables.bak
                        $ sudo iptables -F


                        Result:



                        $ sudo iptables -nvL
                        Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3138 packets, 5567K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3602 packets, 6547K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 5





                          If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                          – RyanH
                          May 17 '18 at 16:35













                        0












                        0








                        0







                        One can do this in 1 or 2 commands:



                         $ sudo iptables-save > iptables.bak
                        $ sudo iptables -F


                        Result:



                        $ sudo iptables -nvL
                        Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3138 packets, 5567K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3602 packets, 6547K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination





                        share|improve this answer













                        One can do this in 1 or 2 commands:



                         $ sudo iptables-save > iptables.bak
                        $ sudo iptables -F


                        Result:



                        $ sudo iptables -nvL
                        Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 3138 packets, 5567K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

                        Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3602 packets, 6547K bytes)
                        pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination






                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Apr 29 '17 at 5:13









                        Mugoma J. OkombaMugoma J. Okomba

                        1233




                        1233







                        • 5





                          If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                          – RyanH
                          May 17 '18 at 16:35












                        • 5





                          If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                          – RyanH
                          May 17 '18 at 16:35







                        5




                        5





                        If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                        – RyanH
                        May 17 '18 at 16:35





                        If the default policies are currently set to DROP, this is a quick way to get locked out of the server. So, no, it's not a 1 or 2 command process. You need to first set to ACCEPT if it's not currently.

                        – RyanH
                        May 17 '18 at 16:35











                        0














                        I've had to block all connections recently what I ended up doing was



                        iptables-policy INPUT DROP
                        iptables-policy OUTPUT DROP
                        iptables-policy FORWARD DROP


                        as for saving I'd recommend the following



                        Ubuntu:



                        /etc/init.d/iptables save
                        /sbin/service iptables save


                        RedHat/CentOS:



                        /etc/init.d/iptables save
                        /sbin/iptables-save


                        In addition to backup all current ufw rules Ive used this in the past



                        cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules /<BACKUP LOCATION> 
                        cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules ./


                        I think this may be useful for future reference. Thought I would share.






                        share|improve this answer





























                          0














                          I've had to block all connections recently what I ended up doing was



                          iptables-policy INPUT DROP
                          iptables-policy OUTPUT DROP
                          iptables-policy FORWARD DROP


                          as for saving I'd recommend the following



                          Ubuntu:



                          /etc/init.d/iptables save
                          /sbin/service iptables save


                          RedHat/CentOS:



                          /etc/init.d/iptables save
                          /sbin/iptables-save


                          In addition to backup all current ufw rules Ive used this in the past



                          cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules /<BACKUP LOCATION> 
                          cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules ./


                          I think this may be useful for future reference. Thought I would share.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            I've had to block all connections recently what I ended up doing was



                            iptables-policy INPUT DROP
                            iptables-policy OUTPUT DROP
                            iptables-policy FORWARD DROP


                            as for saving I'd recommend the following



                            Ubuntu:



                            /etc/init.d/iptables save
                            /sbin/service iptables save


                            RedHat/CentOS:



                            /etc/init.d/iptables save
                            /sbin/iptables-save


                            In addition to backup all current ufw rules Ive used this in the past



                            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules /<BACKUP LOCATION> 
                            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules ./


                            I think this may be useful for future reference. Thought I would share.






                            share|improve this answer















                            I've had to block all connections recently what I ended up doing was



                            iptables-policy INPUT DROP
                            iptables-policy OUTPUT DROP
                            iptables-policy FORWARD DROP


                            as for saving I'd recommend the following



                            Ubuntu:



                            /etc/init.d/iptables save
                            /sbin/service iptables save


                            RedHat/CentOS:



                            /etc/init.d/iptables save
                            /sbin/iptables-save


                            In addition to backup all current ufw rules Ive used this in the past



                            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules /<BACKUP LOCATION> 
                            cp /lib/ufw/user.rules,user6.rules ./


                            I think this may be useful for future reference. Thought I would share.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 5 '18 at 20:05

























                            answered Nov 5 '18 at 19:59









                            BoschkoBoschko

                            13




                            13





















                                0














                                Backups configuration to iptables_backup.conf and clean all rules.



                                iptables-save | tee iptables_backup.conf | grep -v '-A' | iptables-restore


                                To restore previous configuration:



                                iptables-restore < iptables_backup.conf





                                share|improve this answer



























                                  0














                                  Backups configuration to iptables_backup.conf and clean all rules.



                                  iptables-save | tee iptables_backup.conf | grep -v '-A' | iptables-restore


                                  To restore previous configuration:



                                  iptables-restore < iptables_backup.conf





                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0







                                    Backups configuration to iptables_backup.conf and clean all rules.



                                    iptables-save | tee iptables_backup.conf | grep -v '-A' | iptables-restore


                                    To restore previous configuration:



                                    iptables-restore < iptables_backup.conf





                                    share|improve this answer













                                    Backups configuration to iptables_backup.conf and clean all rules.



                                    iptables-save | tee iptables_backup.conf | grep -v '-A' | iptables-restore


                                    To restore previous configuration:



                                    iptables-restore < iptables_backup.conf






                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 11 mins ago









                                    ZibriZibri

                                    1013




                                    1013



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f200635%2fbest-way-to-clear-all-iptables-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

                                        Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

                                        Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the altitude of a satellite defined, given that the Earth is not spherical?Why do satellites appear to move faster when overhead and slower closer to the horizon?For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?Why is Nodal precession affected by the rotational period of the planet?Why is it so difficult to predict the exact reentry location and time of a very low earth orbit object?Why are low earth orbit satellites not visible from the same place all the time?Perifocal coordinates and the orbit equationHow feasible is the Moonspike mission?What was the typical perigee after a shuttle de-orbit burn?I am having trouble calculating my classic orbital elements and am at a loss on where to lookAm I supposed to modify the gravitational constant with scale and why do fps & time scale changes cause my orbit to break?How Local time of a sun synchronous orbit is related to Right ascension of ascending node?What is wrong with my orbit sim equations? How can I fix them?How to obtain the initial positions and velocities of an inclined orbit?