Nginx proxy_pass Base64 URL truncated The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InNGINX returning 404 error on a valid urlNginx proxy_pass response truncatedNginx reverse proxy + URL rewriteNginx $uri variable is truncated during processingnginx terminates connection after 65k bytesHowto rewrite URLs with two nginx as reverse proxies to gunicorn/DjangoNginx: too many redirects trying to return a specific 404 image?porting RewriteCond %QUERY_STRING from Apache2 to nginxIIS10 URL Rewrite 2.1 double encoding issueNGINX redirect rule transform path to query string
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
What is this business jet?
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
"as much details as you can remember"
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
Falsification in Math vs Science
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?
What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
Is bread bad for ducks?
Nginx proxy_pass Base64 URL truncated
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InNGINX returning 404 error on a valid urlNginx proxy_pass response truncatedNginx reverse proxy + URL rewriteNginx $uri variable is truncated during processingnginx terminates connection after 65k bytesHowto rewrite URLs with two nginx as reverse proxies to gunicorn/DjangoNginx: too many redirects trying to return a specific 404 image?porting RewriteCond %QUERY_STRING from Apache2 to nginxIIS10 URL Rewrite 2.1 double encoding issueNGINX redirect rule transform path to query string
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.
That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like
/set/test_9_0/
The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B
in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.
nginx reverse-proxy rewrite
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.
That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like
/set/test_9_0/
The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B
in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.
nginx reverse-proxy rewrite
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.
That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like
/set/test_9_0/
The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B
in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.
nginx reverse-proxy rewrite
I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.
That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like
/set/test_9_0/
The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B
in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.
nginx reverse-proxy rewrite
nginx reverse-proxy rewrite
asked Mar 5 '12 at 0:41
dronusdronus
8131814
8131814
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f366320%2fnginx-proxy-pass-base64-url-truncated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
add a comment |
Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
add a comment |
Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.
Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.
answered Mar 12 '12 at 0:58
dbenhurdbenhur
189119
189119
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
add a comment |
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..
– dronus
Mar 18 '12 at 22:58
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
@dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.
– dbenhur
Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f366320%2fnginx-proxy-pass-base64-url-truncated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown