Nginx proxy_pass Base64 URL truncated The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InNGINX returning 404 error on a valid urlNginx proxy_pass response truncatedNginx reverse proxy + URL rewriteNginx $uri variable is truncated during processingnginx terminates connection after 65k bytesHowto rewrite URLs with two nginx as reverse proxies to gunicorn/DjangoNginx: too many redirects trying to return a specific 404 image?porting RewriteCond %QUERY_STRING from Apache2 to nginxIIS10 URL Rewrite 2.1 double encoding issueNGINX redirect rule transform path to query string

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

What is this business jet?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

"as much details as you can remember"

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Falsification in Math vs Science

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

Is bread bad for ducks?



Nginx proxy_pass Base64 URL truncated



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InNGINX returning 404 error on a valid urlNginx proxy_pass response truncatedNginx reverse proxy + URL rewriteNginx $uri variable is truncated during processingnginx terminates connection after 65k bytesHowto rewrite URLs with two nginx as reverse proxies to gunicorn/DjangoNginx: too many redirects trying to return a specific 404 image?porting RewriteCond %QUERY_STRING from Apache2 to nginxIIS10 URL Rewrite 2.1 double encoding issueNGINX redirect rule transform path to query string



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.



That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like



/set/test_9_0/



The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 4 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.





















    0















    I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.



    That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like



    /set/test_9_0/



    The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.










    share|improve this question














    bumped to the homepage by Community 4 hours ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      0












      0








      0








      I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.



      That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like



      /set/test_9_0/



      The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.










      share|improve this question














      I use a non caching Nginx proxy to map some path on port 80 to an application specific http server on another port.



      That works quite well for almost all URLs, however long URLs containing Base64 encoded data are truncated early. They are truncated at very shot lengths, vastly before the large_client_header_buffers limit. For example, my application server recieve URLs like



      /set/test_9_0/



      The original URL was running for about 1-2 kbytes. It seems that the original URL continued with %2B in this example case right after the cut location. Why does Nginx cut the URL at this location, and how to prevent that? I still need the path translation, as the application will always serve some services at root path level.







      nginx reverse-proxy rewrite






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 5 '12 at 0:41









      dronusdronus

      8131814




      8131814





      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 hours ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 hours ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.






          share|improve this answer























          • I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

            – dronus
            Mar 18 '12 at 22:58











          • @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

            – dbenhur
            Mar 18 '12 at 23:13











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f366320%2fnginx-proxy-pass-base64-url-truncated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.






          share|improve this answer























          • I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

            – dronus
            Mar 18 '12 at 22:58











          • @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

            – dbenhur
            Mar 18 '12 at 23:13















          0














          Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.






          share|improve this answer























          • I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

            – dronus
            Mar 18 '12 at 22:58











          • @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

            – dbenhur
            Mar 18 '12 at 23:13













          0












          0








          0







          Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.






          share|improve this answer













          Might be affected by proxy_headers_hash_max_size . The default is 512, so could be clipping the request header info.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 12 '12 at 0:58









          dbenhurdbenhur

          189119




          189119












          • I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

            – dronus
            Mar 18 '12 at 22:58











          • @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

            – dbenhur
            Mar 18 '12 at 23:13

















          • I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

            – dronus
            Mar 18 '12 at 22:58











          • @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

            – dbenhur
            Mar 18 '12 at 23:13
















          I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

          – dronus
          Mar 18 '12 at 22:58





          I just use the proxy as pass thru without a cache. So computing a hash at all would be a bug a think, and restrict the data iself to the hash length would be even buggier..

          – dronus
          Mar 18 '12 at 22:58













          @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

          – dbenhur
          Mar 18 '12 at 23:13





          @dronus It was just a guess (as I didn't take anytime to try to reproduce your behavior for myself). The caching and proxing is all part of the same nginx module, so it seems possible that even if caching isn't enabled, it still goes through some of the same code-paths when parsing and proxying the headers.

          – dbenhur
          Mar 18 '12 at 23:13

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f366320%2fnginx-proxy-pass-base64-url-truncated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

          Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

          Срби Садржај Географија Етимологија Генетика Историја Језик Религија Популација Познати Срби Види још Напомене Референце Извори Литература Спољашње везе Мени за навигацијууrs.one.un.orgАрхивираноАрхивирано из оригиналаПопис становништва из 2011. годинеCOMMUNITY PROFILE: SERB COMMUNITY„1996 population census in Bosnia and Herzegovina”„CIA - The World Factbook - Bosnia and Herzegovina”American FactFinder - Results„2011 National Household Survey: Data tables”„Srbi u Nemačkoj | Srbi u Njemačkoj | Zentralrat der Serben in Deutschland”оригинала„Vesti online - Srpski informativni portal”„The Serbian Diaspora and Youth: Cross-Border Ties and Opportunities for Development”оригиналаSerben-Demo eskaliert in Wien„The People of Australia – Statistics from the 2011 Census”„Erstmals über eine Million EU- und EFTA Angehörige in der Schweiz”STANOVNIŠTVO PREMA NARODNOSTI – DETALJNA KLASIFIKACIJA – POPIS 2011.(Завод за статистику Црне Горе)title=Présentation de la République de SerbieSerbian | EthnologuePopulation by ethnic affiliation, Slovenia, Census 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991 and 2002Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република Македонија, 2002: Дефинитивни податоциALBANIJA ETNIČKI ČISTI SRBE: Iščezlo 100.000 ljudi pokrštavanjem, kao što su to radile ustaše u NDH! | Telegraf – Najnovije vestiИз удаљене Аргентине„Tab11. Populaţia stabilă după etnie şi limba maternă, pe categorii de localităţi”Суседи броје Србе„Srpska Dijaspora”оригиналаMinifacts about Norway 2012„Statistiques - 01.06.2008”ПРЕДСЕДНИК СРБИЈЕ СА СРБИМА У БРАТИСЛАВИСлавка Драшковић: Многа питања Срба у Црној Гори нерешенаThe Spread of the SlavesGoogle Book„Distribution of European Y-chromosome DNA (Y-DNA) haplogroups by country in percentage”American Journal of Physical Anthropology 142:380–390 (2010)„Архивирана копија”оригинала„Haplogroup I2 (Y-DNA)”„Архивирана копија”оригиналаVTS 01 1 - YouTubeПрви сукоби Срба и Турака - Политикин забавникАрхивираноConstantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando ImperioВизантиски извори за историју народа ЈугославијеDe conversione Croatorum et Serborum: A Lost SourceDe conversione Croatorum et Serborum: Изгубљени извор Константина ПорфирогенитаИсторија српске државностиИсторија српског народаСрбофобија и њени извориСерска област после Душанове смртиИсторија ВизантијеИсторија средњовековне босанске државеСрби међу европским народимаСрби у средњем векуМедијиПодациууууу00577267