Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThere is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Relationship between Gromov-Witten and Taubes' Gromov invariant

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?

Match Roman Numerals

Can there be female White Walkers?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Why doesn't UInt have a toDouble()?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

Is bread bad for ducks?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThere is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes










5












$begingroup$


  • There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.

  • Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.

  • Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
    $1 leq i leq r$.

  • Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.

I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are there any restrictions on $j$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
    $endgroup$
    – 631
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago















5












$begingroup$


  • There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.

  • Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.

  • Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
    $1 leq i leq r$.

  • Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.

I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are there any restrictions on $j$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
    $endgroup$
    – 631
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


  • There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.

  • Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.

  • Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
    $1 leq i leq r$.

  • Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.

I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




  • There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.

  • Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.

  • Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
    $1 leq i leq r$.

  • Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.

I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.







probability-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Felix Marin

68.9k7110147




68.9k7110147










asked 8 hours ago









631631

585




585











  • $begingroup$
    Are there any restrictions on $j$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
    $endgroup$
    – 631
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Are there any restrictions on $j$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
    $endgroup$
    – 631
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:



$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$



Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.



We begin by making the following observation:



$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$



Which gives us:



$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$



Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:



beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let



$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$

which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write



$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$




For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$

We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.



For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.



This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$



$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)



$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)



$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).



$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").



The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:



    $$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$



    Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.



    We begin by making the following observation:



    $$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$



    Which gives us:



    $$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$



    Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:



    beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
    &= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
    &= fracn^2r^2
    endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      3 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Lee
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago















    2












    $begingroup$

    Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:



    $$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$



    Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.



    We begin by making the following observation:



    $$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$



    Which gives us:



    $$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$



    Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:



    beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
    &= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
    &= fracn^2r^2
    endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      3 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Lee
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:



    $$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$



    Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.



    We begin by making the following observation:



    $$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$



    Which gives us:



    $$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$



    Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:



    beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
    &= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
    &= fracn^2r^2
    endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:



    $$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$



    Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.



    We begin by making the following observation:



    $$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$



    Which gives us:



    $$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$



    Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:



    beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
    &= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
    &= fracn^2r^2
    endalign







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 7 hours ago









    Sean LeeSean Lee

    801214




    801214







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      3 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Lee
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      3 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Lee
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    3 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    3 hours ago













    $begingroup$
    Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    2 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Lee
    2 hours ago





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago











    4












    $begingroup$

    For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
    Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
    is $frac1r$. Let



    $$
    Y_k^(i) = begincases
    1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
    0 &, text otherwise
    endcases,
    $$

    which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
    Then you can write



    $$
    X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
    $$




    For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
    $$
    X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
    mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
    $$

    We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
    $$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
    In summary, if $i ne j$, then
    $$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
    where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.



    For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago















    4












    $begingroup$

    For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
    Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
    is $frac1r$. Let



    $$
    Y_k^(i) = begincases
    1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
    0 &, text otherwise
    endcases,
    $$

    which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
    Then you can write



    $$
    X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
    $$




    For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
    $$
    X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
    mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
    $$

    We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
    $$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
    In summary, if $i ne j$, then
    $$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
    where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.



    For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
    Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
    is $frac1r$. Let



    $$
    Y_k^(i) = begincases
    1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
    0 &, text otherwise
    endcases,
    $$

    which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
    Then you can write



    $$
    X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
    $$




    For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
    $$
    X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
    mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
    $$

    We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
    $$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
    In summary, if $i ne j$, then
    $$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
    where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.



    For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
    Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
    is $frac1r$. Let



    $$
    Y_k^(i) = begincases
    1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
    0 &, text otherwise
    endcases,
    $$

    which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
    Then you can write



    $$
    X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
    $$




    For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
    $$
    X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
    mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
    $$

    We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
    $$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
    In summary, if $i ne j$, then
    $$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
    where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.



    For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago









    Daniel Schepler

    9,3341821




    9,3341821










    answered 8 hours ago









    VHarisopVHarisop

    1,228421




    1,228421







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Schepler
      2 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    2 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.



    This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
    $$
    P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
    $$



    $N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)



    $K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)



    $n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).



    $k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").



    The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
    $$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.



      This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
      $$
      P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
      $$



      $N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)



      $K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)



      $n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).



      $k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").



      The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
      $$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.



        This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
        $$
        P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
        $$



        $N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)



        $K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)



        $n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).



        $k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").



        The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
        $$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.



        This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
        $$
        P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
        $$



        $N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)



        $K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)



        $n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).



        $k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").



        The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
        $$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        RScrlliRScrlli

        761114




        761114



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

            Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

            Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the altitude of a satellite defined, given that the Earth is not spherical?Why do satellites appear to move faster when overhead and slower closer to the horizon?For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?Why is Nodal precession affected by the rotational period of the planet?Why is it so difficult to predict the exact reentry location and time of a very low earth orbit object?Why are low earth orbit satellites not visible from the same place all the time?Perifocal coordinates and the orbit equationHow feasible is the Moonspike mission?What was the typical perigee after a shuttle de-orbit burn?I am having trouble calculating my classic orbital elements and am at a loss on where to lookAm I supposed to modify the gravitational constant with scale and why do fps & time scale changes cause my orbit to break?How Local time of a sun synchronous orbit is related to Right ascension of ascending node?What is wrong with my orbit sim equations? How can I fix them?How to obtain the initial positions and velocities of an inclined orbit?