Can a zener diode with a higher power dissipation be used in place of the original one in an audio amplifier? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to find the problem of this old Marantz amplifier?Using a transistor as a diode?Does the line on a zener diode correspond with the line in the symbol?Can a Zener diode be used in place of a Schottky?Replacement power relay for convection ovenCan I replace multiple series diodes with one zener diode?What can I use to replace an SV-04F bias diode?Setting the bias for the power amp section of an audio amplifier?Power of the Zener diodePlease can someone help with a zener diodeHow to find the problem of this old Marantz amplifier?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

How to obtain Confidence Intervals for a LASSO regression?

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Return to UK after being refused entry years previously

How to manage monthly salary

Building a conditional check constraint

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

What did it mean to "align" a radio?

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

Is there any way to tell whether the shot is going to hit you or not?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Are children permitted to help build the Beis Hamikdash?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?



Can a zener diode with a higher power dissipation be used in place of the original one in an audio amplifier?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to find the problem of this old Marantz amplifier?Using a transistor as a diode?Does the line on a zener diode correspond with the line in the symbol?Can a Zener diode be used in place of a Schottky?Replacement power relay for convection ovenCan I replace multiple series diodes with one zener diode?What can I use to replace an SV-04F bias diode?Setting the bias for the power amp section of an audio amplifier?Power of the Zener diodePlease can someone help with a zener diodeHow to find the problem of this old Marantz amplifier?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Following my Marantz PM-68 repair question, I would like to change a faulty zener diode used in the amplification stage.



I don't really understand the purpose of this diode but I guess it's used for some kind of coupling between the positive and negative parts of the audio signal.



I had a look at the service manual, but couldn't find the exact replacement for this diode (BZX79C3V6). The guy at my local electronics store sold me a BZX85C3V6 diode, which has a higher power dissipation rating than the original one (1.3W instead of 0.5W). He told me this wouldn't be an issue.



Do you think it's safe to use the diode he sold me? Do you think it could change the accuracy of the audio signal?



Here is the diode I'm talking about:



Amplifier circuit schematic










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
    $endgroup$
    – Jot
    16 hours ago

















4












$begingroup$


Following my Marantz PM-68 repair question, I would like to change a faulty zener diode used in the amplification stage.



I don't really understand the purpose of this diode but I guess it's used for some kind of coupling between the positive and negative parts of the audio signal.



I had a look at the service manual, but couldn't find the exact replacement for this diode (BZX79C3V6). The guy at my local electronics store sold me a BZX85C3V6 diode, which has a higher power dissipation rating than the original one (1.3W instead of 0.5W). He told me this wouldn't be an issue.



Do you think it's safe to use the diode he sold me? Do you think it could change the accuracy of the audio signal?



Here is the diode I'm talking about:



Amplifier circuit schematic










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
    $endgroup$
    – Jot
    16 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Following my Marantz PM-68 repair question, I would like to change a faulty zener diode used in the amplification stage.



I don't really understand the purpose of this diode but I guess it's used for some kind of coupling between the positive and negative parts of the audio signal.



I had a look at the service manual, but couldn't find the exact replacement for this diode (BZX79C3V6). The guy at my local electronics store sold me a BZX85C3V6 diode, which has a higher power dissipation rating than the original one (1.3W instead of 0.5W). He told me this wouldn't be an issue.



Do you think it's safe to use the diode he sold me? Do you think it could change the accuracy of the audio signal?



Here is the diode I'm talking about:



Amplifier circuit schematic










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Following my Marantz PM-68 repair question, I would like to change a faulty zener diode used in the amplification stage.



I don't really understand the purpose of this diode but I guess it's used for some kind of coupling between the positive and negative parts of the audio signal.



I had a look at the service manual, but couldn't find the exact replacement for this diode (BZX79C3V6). The guy at my local electronics store sold me a BZX85C3V6 diode, which has a higher power dissipation rating than the original one (1.3W instead of 0.5W). He told me this wouldn't be an issue.



Do you think it's safe to use the diode he sold me? Do you think it could change the accuracy of the audio signal?



Here is the diode I'm talking about:



Amplifier circuit schematic







amplifier diodes analog zener






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 16 hours ago









MFlopMFlop

1558




1558







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
    $endgroup$
    – Jot
    16 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
    $endgroup$
    – Jot
    16 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
$endgroup$
– Jot
16 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think it is safe. The zener diode is only there for protection, since the voltage at the transistor base is 1.6v. The original zener diode might have a lower capacitance, but I think that does not matter in that circuit. A zener diode generates a lot of noise, it has therefor no influence on the audio signal, its only job is to protect the transistor in case of a large voltage peak, or perhaps during power on or power off.
$endgroup$
– Jot
16 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

The higher wattage zener will do the same job.



As Jot said, the zeners' role is to provide protection. The higher wattage zener achieves its rated voltage at a higher current than the lower voltage one (60 mA versus 5 mA) so in a fault the voltage will rise higher with the high wattage zener, but the protection feature will work "about as well".



The zeners are 3.6V rated but the diagram shows that the transistor bases are usually at 1.6 VDC - and the zener is in series with a 1N4148 diode that adds about 0.6V to the zener voltage - SO the zener is usually far from conducting.



If that zener has blown it suggests that a major voltage spike may have occurred.
The preceding 2SA 1360 (component 7266) and perhaps the 150R (3294) may also be damaged.
If they are then whatever caused the spike or continual high voltage may still be present. **IF* the circuit will accept power without blowing something I'd suggest measuring all the voltages shown to the left of capacitor 2268 to see if any are 'out of kilter'. But, it is quite likkely even more complex than that ....



As the circuit has negative feedback applied (via 3286 / 27k) the operation of the whole circuit needs to be correct for correct voltages to apply anywhere. So eg a short circuit output transistor could cause the zener to blow when the output short causes the input stage to go "to rail" and provide excess voltage to the zener. IF the output stage is at fault then grounding the left hand side of 3286 / 27k simulates zero output with the output at 0 VDC. This SHOULD cause all voltages up to the fault to be correct as shown on the diagram (for an unknown range of values of "should" :-).



This grounding od 7254/2SC2240 base works (hopefully) because transistors 7242 / 7254 form a "long tailed pair" differential amplifier, which has zero output when its two inputs are at equal potential. As 7252 base is held at DC ground by 3258/27k, and with no audio input via the input at far left (capacitor name and size truncated) then 0 VDC on both the bases corresponds to zero input and all voltages SHOULD be as shown.



More comment can be made - depending on what response is received to this answer.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    That structure around the zener diodes is a standard class AB amplifier stage. Here's a simplified schematic showing the principle. I borrowed the picture from this site.



    enter image description here



    Note the two Vbias batteries (or voltage sources), they are needed to make the transistors operate at the right biasing point.



    Here the signal is applied "in the middle" between both batteries, in your Marantz's schematic the signal is applied at both bases of the transistors. For the operation of the circuit that does not make much difference as there will always be 2 * Vbias between both bases.



    The Marantz's circuit there are emitter resistors which are not present here.



    True, these make the biasing current less dependent on the precise value of Vbias. In my principle circuit, if Vbias is increased slightly, the biasing current (collector currents of the transistors) will increase more than just slightly as Ic responds in an exponential way to Vbe. Adding resistors in series with the emitters make that behavior much less "violent". Then a slight increase of Vbias will only cause a slight increase of the biasing current.



    In the Marantz's circuit the Vbias sources are implemented with a zener diode in series with a standard silicon diode. This is probably done for temperature behavior, the silicon diode will have the same temperature behavior as the transistor's Vbe so the biasing current become less dependent on temperature.



    The zener diode isn't that critical, as long as it make a voltage drop of the correct voltage the circuit will work. So using a zener diode rated for a higher power should not be any issue, it will still drop about 3.6 V, same as the original zener diodes.



    The audio signal should not be affected by this as this amplifier uses feedback (resistor 3286) to minimize distortions.



    So yes, it is perfectly fine to use 3.6 V, 1.3 W zener diodes as a replacement.



    Edit:



    Actually the implementation is a bit different, as Jot commented correctly, the zener diodes are only for protection, they limit the maximum value of the value of Vbias (prevent it from getting too large). The actual value of Vbias is set by the "zener diode circuit" around NPN transistor 7258 (left of those zener diodes).



    Note the +1.6 V and -1.6 V notes at the bases of the NPN and PNP (7272 and 7274), that's 3.2 V across two 3.6 V zener diodes + 2 standard diodes: these diodes will never conduct in normal operation.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      );
      , "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f431760%2fcan-a-zener-diode-with-a-higher-power-dissipation-be-used-in-place-of-the-origin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8












      $begingroup$

      The higher wattage zener will do the same job.



      As Jot said, the zeners' role is to provide protection. The higher wattage zener achieves its rated voltage at a higher current than the lower voltage one (60 mA versus 5 mA) so in a fault the voltage will rise higher with the high wattage zener, but the protection feature will work "about as well".



      The zeners are 3.6V rated but the diagram shows that the transistor bases are usually at 1.6 VDC - and the zener is in series with a 1N4148 diode that adds about 0.6V to the zener voltage - SO the zener is usually far from conducting.



      If that zener has blown it suggests that a major voltage spike may have occurred.
      The preceding 2SA 1360 (component 7266) and perhaps the 150R (3294) may also be damaged.
      If they are then whatever caused the spike or continual high voltage may still be present. **IF* the circuit will accept power without blowing something I'd suggest measuring all the voltages shown to the left of capacitor 2268 to see if any are 'out of kilter'. But, it is quite likkely even more complex than that ....



      As the circuit has negative feedback applied (via 3286 / 27k) the operation of the whole circuit needs to be correct for correct voltages to apply anywhere. So eg a short circuit output transistor could cause the zener to blow when the output short causes the input stage to go "to rail" and provide excess voltage to the zener. IF the output stage is at fault then grounding the left hand side of 3286 / 27k simulates zero output with the output at 0 VDC. This SHOULD cause all voltages up to the fault to be correct as shown on the diagram (for an unknown range of values of "should" :-).



      This grounding od 7254/2SC2240 base works (hopefully) because transistors 7242 / 7254 form a "long tailed pair" differential amplifier, which has zero output when its two inputs are at equal potential. As 7252 base is held at DC ground by 3258/27k, and with no audio input via the input at far left (capacitor name and size truncated) then 0 VDC on both the bases corresponds to zero input and all voltages SHOULD be as shown.



      More comment can be made - depending on what response is received to this answer.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        8












        $begingroup$

        The higher wattage zener will do the same job.



        As Jot said, the zeners' role is to provide protection. The higher wattage zener achieves its rated voltage at a higher current than the lower voltage one (60 mA versus 5 mA) so in a fault the voltage will rise higher with the high wattage zener, but the protection feature will work "about as well".



        The zeners are 3.6V rated but the diagram shows that the transistor bases are usually at 1.6 VDC - and the zener is in series with a 1N4148 diode that adds about 0.6V to the zener voltage - SO the zener is usually far from conducting.



        If that zener has blown it suggests that a major voltage spike may have occurred.
        The preceding 2SA 1360 (component 7266) and perhaps the 150R (3294) may also be damaged.
        If they are then whatever caused the spike or continual high voltage may still be present. **IF* the circuit will accept power without blowing something I'd suggest measuring all the voltages shown to the left of capacitor 2268 to see if any are 'out of kilter'. But, it is quite likkely even more complex than that ....



        As the circuit has negative feedback applied (via 3286 / 27k) the operation of the whole circuit needs to be correct for correct voltages to apply anywhere. So eg a short circuit output transistor could cause the zener to blow when the output short causes the input stage to go "to rail" and provide excess voltage to the zener. IF the output stage is at fault then grounding the left hand side of 3286 / 27k simulates zero output with the output at 0 VDC. This SHOULD cause all voltages up to the fault to be correct as shown on the diagram (for an unknown range of values of "should" :-).



        This grounding od 7254/2SC2240 base works (hopefully) because transistors 7242 / 7254 form a "long tailed pair" differential amplifier, which has zero output when its two inputs are at equal potential. As 7252 base is held at DC ground by 3258/27k, and with no audio input via the input at far left (capacitor name and size truncated) then 0 VDC on both the bases corresponds to zero input and all voltages SHOULD be as shown.



        More comment can be made - depending on what response is received to this answer.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          The higher wattage zener will do the same job.



          As Jot said, the zeners' role is to provide protection. The higher wattage zener achieves its rated voltage at a higher current than the lower voltage one (60 mA versus 5 mA) so in a fault the voltage will rise higher with the high wattage zener, but the protection feature will work "about as well".



          The zeners are 3.6V rated but the diagram shows that the transistor bases are usually at 1.6 VDC - and the zener is in series with a 1N4148 diode that adds about 0.6V to the zener voltage - SO the zener is usually far from conducting.



          If that zener has blown it suggests that a major voltage spike may have occurred.
          The preceding 2SA 1360 (component 7266) and perhaps the 150R (3294) may also be damaged.
          If they are then whatever caused the spike or continual high voltage may still be present. **IF* the circuit will accept power without blowing something I'd suggest measuring all the voltages shown to the left of capacitor 2268 to see if any are 'out of kilter'. But, it is quite likkely even more complex than that ....



          As the circuit has negative feedback applied (via 3286 / 27k) the operation of the whole circuit needs to be correct for correct voltages to apply anywhere. So eg a short circuit output transistor could cause the zener to blow when the output short causes the input stage to go "to rail" and provide excess voltage to the zener. IF the output stage is at fault then grounding the left hand side of 3286 / 27k simulates zero output with the output at 0 VDC. This SHOULD cause all voltages up to the fault to be correct as shown on the diagram (for an unknown range of values of "should" :-).



          This grounding od 7254/2SC2240 base works (hopefully) because transistors 7242 / 7254 form a "long tailed pair" differential amplifier, which has zero output when its two inputs are at equal potential. As 7252 base is held at DC ground by 3258/27k, and with no audio input via the input at far left (capacitor name and size truncated) then 0 VDC on both the bases corresponds to zero input and all voltages SHOULD be as shown.



          More comment can be made - depending on what response is received to this answer.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The higher wattage zener will do the same job.



          As Jot said, the zeners' role is to provide protection. The higher wattage zener achieves its rated voltage at a higher current than the lower voltage one (60 mA versus 5 mA) so in a fault the voltage will rise higher with the high wattage zener, but the protection feature will work "about as well".



          The zeners are 3.6V rated but the diagram shows that the transistor bases are usually at 1.6 VDC - and the zener is in series with a 1N4148 diode that adds about 0.6V to the zener voltage - SO the zener is usually far from conducting.



          If that zener has blown it suggests that a major voltage spike may have occurred.
          The preceding 2SA 1360 (component 7266) and perhaps the 150R (3294) may also be damaged.
          If they are then whatever caused the spike or continual high voltage may still be present. **IF* the circuit will accept power without blowing something I'd suggest measuring all the voltages shown to the left of capacitor 2268 to see if any are 'out of kilter'. But, it is quite likkely even more complex than that ....



          As the circuit has negative feedback applied (via 3286 / 27k) the operation of the whole circuit needs to be correct for correct voltages to apply anywhere. So eg a short circuit output transistor could cause the zener to blow when the output short causes the input stage to go "to rail" and provide excess voltage to the zener. IF the output stage is at fault then grounding the left hand side of 3286 / 27k simulates zero output with the output at 0 VDC. This SHOULD cause all voltages up to the fault to be correct as shown on the diagram (for an unknown range of values of "should" :-).



          This grounding od 7254/2SC2240 base works (hopefully) because transistors 7242 / 7254 form a "long tailed pair" differential amplifier, which has zero output when its two inputs are at equal potential. As 7252 base is held at DC ground by 3258/27k, and with no audio input via the input at far left (capacitor name and size truncated) then 0 VDC on both the bases corresponds to zero input and all voltages SHOULD be as shown.



          More comment can be made - depending on what response is received to this answer.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 16 hours ago

























          answered 16 hours ago









          Russell McMahonRussell McMahon

          118k9165297




          118k9165297























              2












              $begingroup$

              That structure around the zener diodes is a standard class AB amplifier stage. Here's a simplified schematic showing the principle. I borrowed the picture from this site.



              enter image description here



              Note the two Vbias batteries (or voltage sources), they are needed to make the transistors operate at the right biasing point.



              Here the signal is applied "in the middle" between both batteries, in your Marantz's schematic the signal is applied at both bases of the transistors. For the operation of the circuit that does not make much difference as there will always be 2 * Vbias between both bases.



              The Marantz's circuit there are emitter resistors which are not present here.



              True, these make the biasing current less dependent on the precise value of Vbias. In my principle circuit, if Vbias is increased slightly, the biasing current (collector currents of the transistors) will increase more than just slightly as Ic responds in an exponential way to Vbe. Adding resistors in series with the emitters make that behavior much less "violent". Then a slight increase of Vbias will only cause a slight increase of the biasing current.



              In the Marantz's circuit the Vbias sources are implemented with a zener diode in series with a standard silicon diode. This is probably done for temperature behavior, the silicon diode will have the same temperature behavior as the transistor's Vbe so the biasing current become less dependent on temperature.



              The zener diode isn't that critical, as long as it make a voltage drop of the correct voltage the circuit will work. So using a zener diode rated for a higher power should not be any issue, it will still drop about 3.6 V, same as the original zener diodes.



              The audio signal should not be affected by this as this amplifier uses feedback (resistor 3286) to minimize distortions.



              So yes, it is perfectly fine to use 3.6 V, 1.3 W zener diodes as a replacement.



              Edit:



              Actually the implementation is a bit different, as Jot commented correctly, the zener diodes are only for protection, they limit the maximum value of the value of Vbias (prevent it from getting too large). The actual value of Vbias is set by the "zener diode circuit" around NPN transistor 7258 (left of those zener diodes).



              Note the +1.6 V and -1.6 V notes at the bases of the NPN and PNP (7272 and 7274), that's 3.2 V across two 3.6 V zener diodes + 2 standard diodes: these diodes will never conduct in normal operation.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                That structure around the zener diodes is a standard class AB amplifier stage. Here's a simplified schematic showing the principle. I borrowed the picture from this site.



                enter image description here



                Note the two Vbias batteries (or voltage sources), they are needed to make the transistors operate at the right biasing point.



                Here the signal is applied "in the middle" between both batteries, in your Marantz's schematic the signal is applied at both bases of the transistors. For the operation of the circuit that does not make much difference as there will always be 2 * Vbias between both bases.



                The Marantz's circuit there are emitter resistors which are not present here.



                True, these make the biasing current less dependent on the precise value of Vbias. In my principle circuit, if Vbias is increased slightly, the biasing current (collector currents of the transistors) will increase more than just slightly as Ic responds in an exponential way to Vbe. Adding resistors in series with the emitters make that behavior much less "violent". Then a slight increase of Vbias will only cause a slight increase of the biasing current.



                In the Marantz's circuit the Vbias sources are implemented with a zener diode in series with a standard silicon diode. This is probably done for temperature behavior, the silicon diode will have the same temperature behavior as the transistor's Vbe so the biasing current become less dependent on temperature.



                The zener diode isn't that critical, as long as it make a voltage drop of the correct voltage the circuit will work. So using a zener diode rated for a higher power should not be any issue, it will still drop about 3.6 V, same as the original zener diodes.



                The audio signal should not be affected by this as this amplifier uses feedback (resistor 3286) to minimize distortions.



                So yes, it is perfectly fine to use 3.6 V, 1.3 W zener diodes as a replacement.



                Edit:



                Actually the implementation is a bit different, as Jot commented correctly, the zener diodes are only for protection, they limit the maximum value of the value of Vbias (prevent it from getting too large). The actual value of Vbias is set by the "zener diode circuit" around NPN transistor 7258 (left of those zener diodes).



                Note the +1.6 V and -1.6 V notes at the bases of the NPN and PNP (7272 and 7274), that's 3.2 V across two 3.6 V zener diodes + 2 standard diodes: these diodes will never conduct in normal operation.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  That structure around the zener diodes is a standard class AB amplifier stage. Here's a simplified schematic showing the principle. I borrowed the picture from this site.



                  enter image description here



                  Note the two Vbias batteries (or voltage sources), they are needed to make the transistors operate at the right biasing point.



                  Here the signal is applied "in the middle" between both batteries, in your Marantz's schematic the signal is applied at both bases of the transistors. For the operation of the circuit that does not make much difference as there will always be 2 * Vbias between both bases.



                  The Marantz's circuit there are emitter resistors which are not present here.



                  True, these make the biasing current less dependent on the precise value of Vbias. In my principle circuit, if Vbias is increased slightly, the biasing current (collector currents of the transistors) will increase more than just slightly as Ic responds in an exponential way to Vbe. Adding resistors in series with the emitters make that behavior much less "violent". Then a slight increase of Vbias will only cause a slight increase of the biasing current.



                  In the Marantz's circuit the Vbias sources are implemented with a zener diode in series with a standard silicon diode. This is probably done for temperature behavior, the silicon diode will have the same temperature behavior as the transistor's Vbe so the biasing current become less dependent on temperature.



                  The zener diode isn't that critical, as long as it make a voltage drop of the correct voltage the circuit will work. So using a zener diode rated for a higher power should not be any issue, it will still drop about 3.6 V, same as the original zener diodes.



                  The audio signal should not be affected by this as this amplifier uses feedback (resistor 3286) to minimize distortions.



                  So yes, it is perfectly fine to use 3.6 V, 1.3 W zener diodes as a replacement.



                  Edit:



                  Actually the implementation is a bit different, as Jot commented correctly, the zener diodes are only for protection, they limit the maximum value of the value of Vbias (prevent it from getting too large). The actual value of Vbias is set by the "zener diode circuit" around NPN transistor 7258 (left of those zener diodes).



                  Note the +1.6 V and -1.6 V notes at the bases of the NPN and PNP (7272 and 7274), that's 3.2 V across two 3.6 V zener diodes + 2 standard diodes: these diodes will never conduct in normal operation.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  That structure around the zener diodes is a standard class AB amplifier stage. Here's a simplified schematic showing the principle. I borrowed the picture from this site.



                  enter image description here



                  Note the two Vbias batteries (or voltage sources), they are needed to make the transistors operate at the right biasing point.



                  Here the signal is applied "in the middle" between both batteries, in your Marantz's schematic the signal is applied at both bases of the transistors. For the operation of the circuit that does not make much difference as there will always be 2 * Vbias between both bases.



                  The Marantz's circuit there are emitter resistors which are not present here.



                  True, these make the biasing current less dependent on the precise value of Vbias. In my principle circuit, if Vbias is increased slightly, the biasing current (collector currents of the transistors) will increase more than just slightly as Ic responds in an exponential way to Vbe. Adding resistors in series with the emitters make that behavior much less "violent". Then a slight increase of Vbias will only cause a slight increase of the biasing current.



                  In the Marantz's circuit the Vbias sources are implemented with a zener diode in series with a standard silicon diode. This is probably done for temperature behavior, the silicon diode will have the same temperature behavior as the transistor's Vbe so the biasing current become less dependent on temperature.



                  The zener diode isn't that critical, as long as it make a voltage drop of the correct voltage the circuit will work. So using a zener diode rated for a higher power should not be any issue, it will still drop about 3.6 V, same as the original zener diodes.



                  The audio signal should not be affected by this as this amplifier uses feedback (resistor 3286) to minimize distortions.



                  So yes, it is perfectly fine to use 3.6 V, 1.3 W zener diodes as a replacement.



                  Edit:



                  Actually the implementation is a bit different, as Jot commented correctly, the zener diodes are only for protection, they limit the maximum value of the value of Vbias (prevent it from getting too large). The actual value of Vbias is set by the "zener diode circuit" around NPN transistor 7258 (left of those zener diodes).



                  Note the +1.6 V and -1.6 V notes at the bases of the NPN and PNP (7272 and 7274), that's 3.2 V across two 3.6 V zener diodes + 2 standard diodes: these diodes will never conduct in normal operation.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 13 hours ago

























                  answered 16 hours ago









                  BimpelrekkieBimpelrekkie

                  51.4k246114




                  51.4k246114



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f431760%2fcan-a-zener-diode-with-a-higher-power-dissipation-be-used-in-place-of-the-origin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

                      How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes the Thrown property mean I can attack with my DEX?Is it possible to build a custom weapon, and if so, how will my character be able to use it?Can the Ghost Touch weapon property allow an attacker to perform incorporeal touch attacks?The DM allowed me to wield two shields, how can I get the most AC and HP, as a Bear Barbarian?Are there ways other than Kensei Weapons or Hex Warrior to use an ability other than STR for non-finesse melee weapons?Cheapest way to cast spells with sword and (heavy) shield?Is this homebrew “Throwing Weapons Master” feat balanced?Can Hexblade warlocks use a staff and shield?Are there any balance issues with allowing thrown Javelins to be drawn for free like ammunition weapons?Does an unattuned Frost Brand weapon still glow in freezing temperatures?Does a druid starting with a bow start with no arrows?Is it possible to build a custom weapon, and if so, how will my character be able to use it?

                      Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan an indestructible creature die by a combination of damage and -X/-X effects?Can a non-instant or sorcery ever have flashback?do creatures created after a “all creatures get -1/-1 until end of turn” instant get -1/-1 as well?What happens when I target an indestructible card with an “if that would die this turn, exile it instead” effect?Exalted trigger timingWhat happens when a non-token creature loses all abilities, is exiled, then returns?Does the spell cast with Yahenni's Expertise resolve before state-based effects are checked?What happens if Always Watching is destroyed mid-combat?MTG: Abilities lost when exiled?Under which controller does a stolen permanent come into play after being exiled?