How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the time signature switching every measure?3/2 Time signatureHow to notate a time signature that alternates every few measures?Changing Time SignatureCounting a time signatureMeter and time signature headacheAssessing the time signature of a single measureTime signature problems in Debussy's “Clair de lune”How do I notate a staccato on a unison note?How to identify time signature from notation

How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?

During Temple times, who can butcher a kosher animal?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they wild shape into that animal?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Lightning Grid - Columns and Rows?

Geography at the pixel level

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Falsification in Math vs Science

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?



How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs the time signature switching every measure?3/2 Time signatureHow to notate a time signature that alternates every few measures?Changing Time SignatureCounting a time signatureMeter and time signature headacheAssessing the time signature of a single measureTime signature problems in Debussy's “Clair de lune”How do I notate a staccato on a unison note?How to identify time signature from notation










9















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    15 hours ago












  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    14 hours ago











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    14 hours ago











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    9 hours ago
















9















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    15 hours ago












  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    14 hours ago











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    14 hours ago











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    9 hours ago














9












9








9








It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?










share|improve this question
















It seems my musical journey's always pushing me into left field territory when it comes to notation ... So this time I'd like to know what would be a good way to notate a consistent switching of time signature every measure.



The piece I'm writing constantly alternates between 5/4 and 3/4, however I think it would be very tiring to read - I assume - if it's written like this:



enter image description here



Should I just mention it at the beginning (If so, how?) and leave out the time signatures? E.g. giving me a score like this:



enter image description here



As you can see that's quite confusing too, since even though the time signature's hidden, there's some space left open. But that's maybe just a limitation of Musescore...



Or maybe I should just go with 8/4 and explain the counting, something like "5+3"?







notation time-signatures meter engraving






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Richard

45k7105195




45k7105195










asked 15 hours ago









CreyndersCreynders

7791314




7791314







  • 2





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    15 hours ago












  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    14 hours ago











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    14 hours ago











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    9 hours ago













  • 2





    ...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

    – Tetsujin
    15 hours ago












  • Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

    – Creynders
    14 hours ago











  • I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

    – Tetsujin
    14 hours ago











  • Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago











  • 8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

    – Ringo
    9 hours ago








2




2





...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

– Tetsujin
15 hours ago






...or write it in either 8/4 or even just 4/4 & accent the appropriate beat, with some kind of similie instruction at the top. I know i'd be far more comfortable thinking in terms of "every 2nd bar accent the 2"

– Tetsujin
15 hours ago














Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

– Creynders
14 hours ago





Could you give an example of how you would write that down @Tetsujin?

– Creynders
14 hours ago













I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

– Tetsujin
14 hours ago





I don't have a scoring app here so I can't do it graphically, sorry - but I'd start out just with something like "Treat as though 5/4+3/4, then over the first couple of bars, I'd add > over the relevant '6th note' for the first few bars & write similie in the next bar. [I have to admit I'm treating it more like a rock band forming a groove/feel than an orchestra reading the dots.]

– Tetsujin
14 hours ago













Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

– Ian Goldby
12 hours ago





Just for the record, it's certainly not unknown to write a new time signature at the start of every bar - e.g. sheetmusicnow.com/products/… Having said that, I've also seen this song notated in 5/4.

– Ian Goldby
12 hours ago













8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

– Ringo
9 hours ago






8/4 is a good way to go. you don't really have to explain the beat. it would be implied from the music itself.

– Ringo
9 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















21














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    15 hours ago


















8














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago



















7














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    10 hours ago












  • But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

    – Michael Curtis
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    7 hours ago


















7














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    11 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82586%2fhow-to-notate-time-signature-switching-consistently-every-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









21














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    15 hours ago















21














Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    15 hours ago













21












21








21







Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Yes, one possible way is to clarify a "5+3" meter throughout. Depending on the music, this could be preferable to just writing 8/4 if the meter is clearly a 5+3 layout.



As one example of how this could be done, consider something like:



enter image description here



Notice that, in the second full measure, a dotted barline shows the distinction between the 5/4 and 3/4 portions of the meter. This is optional; I've seen music like this notated with and without that dotted barline (or something equivalent to it).



As a very similar alternative, you can also notate it without repeating the bottom portion of the time signature:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 15 hours ago

























answered 15 hours ago









RichardRichard

45k7105195




45k7105195







  • 2





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    15 hours ago












  • 2





    Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

    – Creynders
    15 hours ago







2




2





Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

– Creynders
15 hours ago





Especially the dotted bar line will make sense in some places, where one of the instruments goes against the ebb and flow feeling

– Creynders
15 hours ago











8














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago
















8














One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer























  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago














8












8








8







One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.






share|improve this answer













One way which is possible is to show two time signatures, as here from Tchaikovsky's second String Quartet via Popflock:



Multiple time signatures



This warns the user that bars of each length are to be expected.



You haven't tagged the question MuseScore, but MuseScore does allow bars of varying length without having to put a time signature in every time. Right-click the bar, select "Bar properties..." and set the number of beats that bar should have. I think it's intended to allow the last bar to be balanced with an anacrusis at the beginning of a piece, but it works elsewhere.



MuseScore



Unfortunately while this makes it possible to have bars of different lengths, MuseScore can't show more than one time signature at the start.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









Andrew LeachAndrew Leach

44728




44728












  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago


















  • You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago

















You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

– trlkly
2 hours ago






You can do it, if you cheat a bit. You'd need to put the second time signature in a second measure, and then set the "leading space" to be negative enough to position the second one beside the first, and then manually re-position anything that is in the wrong place. You'd want to do it after you're finished with that line (and use a system break) so it doesn't move on you again. - - That said, it would be nice to have proper support.

– trlkly
2 hours ago












7














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    10 hours ago












  • But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

    – Michael Curtis
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    7 hours ago















7














Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    10 hours ago












  • But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

    – Michael Curtis
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    7 hours ago













7












7








7







Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













Most of the mixed-meter scores I've seen use non-dotted measure lines as well (and no "+" sign between the paired meter notations.) . It's just treated as "we will always be switching meter every bar" . See for example West Side Story "America" where it goes into 6/8-3/4 swap time.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 14 hours ago









Carl WitthoftCarl Witthoft

9,31021331




9,31021331







  • 6





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    10 hours ago












  • But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

    – Michael Curtis
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    7 hours ago












  • 6





    In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

    – Ian Goldby
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

    – supercat
    10 hours ago












  • But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

    – Michael Curtis
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

    – ContextSwitch
    7 hours ago







6




6





In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

– Ian Goldby
12 hours ago





In this case what changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration, so I don't think it really answers the question.

– Ian Goldby
12 hours ago




1




1





Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

– Michael Curtis
12 hours ago





Also, even as notated it shows a single meter change not the additive meter

– Michael Curtis
12 hours ago




1




1





@MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

– supercat
10 hours ago






@MichaelCurtis: Starting at bar 32, the meter changes every measure, though the piece would still work if a director opted to conduct as a straight 6/8 throughout. Even if the director conducts as straight 6/8, however, the violin 2 player should still regard second eighth note in bars like 33, 35, etc. as being off the beat and should thus not accent them more strongly than the first.

– supercat
10 hours ago














But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

– Michael Curtis
9 hours ago





But, as @IanGoldby points out "...changes is the subdivision of the bar, not the total bar duration..." this example doesn't match the case in the OP question.

– Michael Curtis
9 hours ago




2




2





This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

– ContextSwitch
7 hours ago





This example is more general than OP's question. A generalized solution should be acceptable.

– ContextSwitch
7 hours ago











7














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    11 hours ago
















7














As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer























  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    11 hours ago














7












7








7







As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.






share|improve this answer













As a possible alterative to Richard's answer, you can write the total in the time signature and the division above the staff like this:



Serenade for Organ by Derek Bourgeois



This may be easier, depending on the capabilities of your notation software. However, it does imply that the divisions are the fundamental beats. In this case that is four beats to the bar, with beats 1, 2, and 4 being longer than beat 3. But in the original question the beats are implied to be all equal quarter notes.



However, that might prompt you to ask whether this is actually true? Or are the intended groupings really 3+2+3 (or even 2+3+3)? After all, 5/4 is almost always 3+2 or 2+3.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









Ian GoldbyIan Goldby

29519




29519












  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    11 hours ago


















  • Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

    – Michael Curtis
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

    – Pam
    11 hours ago

















Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

– Michael Curtis
12 hours ago





Nice point about 5 breaking down to 3's & 2's. Perhaps there will be cases where 3+2 or 2+3 isn't one constant pattern throughout, but when it is, it seems friendly to show the full additive breakdown.

– Michael Curtis
12 hours ago




1




1





I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

– Pam
11 hours ago






I was going to add that the Derek Bourgeois piece "Serenade" used 11/8 and 13/8 used this (there’s a wind band version plus score on YouTube). I found it quite intuitive to read. But I think that’s your example!

– Pam
11 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82586%2fhow-to-notate-time-signature-switching-consistently-every-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the altitude of a satellite defined, given that the Earth is not spherical?Why do satellites appear to move faster when overhead and slower closer to the horizon?For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?Why is Nodal precession affected by the rotational period of the planet?Why is it so difficult to predict the exact reentry location and time of a very low earth orbit object?Why are low earth orbit satellites not visible from the same place all the time?Perifocal coordinates and the orbit equationHow feasible is the Moonspike mission?What was the typical perigee after a shuttle de-orbit burn?I am having trouble calculating my classic orbital elements and am at a loss on where to lookAm I supposed to modify the gravitational constant with scale and why do fps & time scale changes cause my orbit to break?How Local time of a sun synchronous orbit is related to Right ascension of ascending node?What is wrong with my orbit sim equations? How can I fix them?How to obtain the initial positions and velocities of an inclined orbit?