Is flight data recorder erased after every flight? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhen are black boxes used?What protects the location beacon (pinger) of a flight data recorder?Is there anywhere I can pick up raw flight data recorder information?Who legally owns the Flight Data Recorder?Constructing flight recorder dataWhy are FDRs and CVRs still two separate physical devices?What are the data elements shown on the GE235 flight data recorder (FDR) plot?Are CVR and FDR reset after every flight?What is the format of data stored by a Flight Data Recorder?How much data is stored in the flight data recorder per hour in a typical flight of an A380?Is a smart flight data recorder possible?

Falsification in Math vs Science

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Can the Protection from Evil and Good spell be used on the caster?

The difference between dialogue marks

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Output the Arecibo Message

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

aging parents with no investments

Inline version of a function returns different value than non-inline version

What can other administrators access on my machine?

What is this 4-propeller plane?

How come people say “Would of”?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

I see my dog run

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Pristine Bit Checking

Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?



Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhen are black boxes used?What protects the location beacon (pinger) of a flight data recorder?Is there anywhere I can pick up raw flight data recorder information?Who legally owns the Flight Data Recorder?Constructing flight recorder dataWhy are FDRs and CVRs still two separate physical devices?What are the data elements shown on the GE235 flight data recorder (FDR) plot?Are CVR and FDR reset after every flight?What is the format of data stored by a Flight Data Recorder?How much data is stored in the flight data recorder per hour in a typical flight of an A380?Is a smart flight data recorder possible?










12












$begingroup$


Flight data recorders store massive amounts of data per flight and despite improvements year on year with data storage as with Moore's law, carrying larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight.



So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 13




    $begingroup$
    "larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – abelenky
    17 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
    $endgroup$
    – mins
    17 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
    $endgroup$
    – Cpt Reynolds
    11 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
    $endgroup$
    – Graham
    6 hours ago















12












$begingroup$


Flight data recorders store massive amounts of data per flight and despite improvements year on year with data storage as with Moore's law, carrying larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight.



So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 13




    $begingroup$
    "larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – abelenky
    17 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
    $endgroup$
    – mins
    17 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
    $endgroup$
    – Cpt Reynolds
    11 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
    $endgroup$
    – Graham
    6 hours ago













12












12








12





$begingroup$


Flight data recorders store massive amounts of data per flight and despite improvements year on year with data storage as with Moore's law, carrying larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight.



So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Flight data recorders store massive amounts of data per flight and despite improvements year on year with data storage as with Moore's law, carrying larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight.



So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?







flight-data-recorder






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago









David Richerby

10.3k33579




10.3k33579










asked 19 hours ago









securitydude5securitydude5

3,60342764




3,60342764







  • 13




    $begingroup$
    "larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – abelenky
    17 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
    $endgroup$
    – mins
    17 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
    $endgroup$
    – Cpt Reynolds
    11 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
    $endgroup$
    – Graham
    6 hours ago












  • 13




    $begingroup$
    "larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – abelenky
    17 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
    $endgroup$
    – mins
    17 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
    $endgroup$
    – Cpt Reynolds
    11 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
    $endgroup$
    – Graham
    6 hours ago







13




13




$begingroup$
"larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
$endgroup$
– abelenky
17 hours ago





$begingroup$
"larger and larger amounts of data can become expensive, through larger hard drives and the extra weight." Patently false. Standard 128GB microSD flash cards are cheap, have massive storage, and weigh nothing.
$endgroup$
– abelenky
17 hours ago













$begingroup$
Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
$endgroup$
– mins
17 hours ago





$begingroup$
Aparat from the mandatory crash-proof FDR, there are WiFi data recorders (WQAR) that are just downloaded at the airport, data continue to live on the ground. Other just use optical media to store Tb of data (related).
$endgroup$
– mins
17 hours ago





3




3




$begingroup$
I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
$endgroup$
– Cpt Reynolds
11 hours ago





$begingroup$
I don’t feel Moore‘s law is applicable here, as cost would be prohibitive when attempting to certify aviation hardware (which has completely different reliability, environmental and robustness requirements) at the same rate as consumer hardware is developed.
$endgroup$
– Cpt Reynolds
11 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Aron I think the implication is that if we can fit 128GB on a thumbnail sized chip, we don't need to worry about "size and weight" of additional storage. Just harden your solid state storage and you're done. You're not adding additional drives or making a bigger tape these days.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
$endgroup$
– Graham
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Aron Nor does any hard drive, so that's a silly thing to say. The reason these things survive such extreme conditions is entirely down to the casing. And in point of fact, SSDs are way more robust to impact and temperatures than any hard drive.
$endgroup$
– Graham
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















21












$begingroup$

Flight data recorders have changed over the years and evolved to what they are today. Modern recorders are recording up to 88 parameters. The storage of the recorder is dependent on the range of the aircraft. Early recorders were using a circular tape that ran through the recorder. E.g. loop recording all the data and automatically overwriting the oldest data on the tape.



The recorder of a Boeing 777 is based around modern solid state storage, capable of recording up to 25 hours continuously. Modern flight recorders are still recording continuously, so after the initial 25 hours, the storage is full. It will then start overwriting the oldest datablock stored. This ensures that you will always have the last 25 hours of data before a crash available for research.




Flight data recorders were first introduced in the 1950s. Many first-generation FDRs used metal foil as the recording medium, with each single strip of foil capable of recording 200 to 400 hr of data. This metal foil was housed in a crash- survivable box installed in the aft end of an airplane. Beginning in 1965, FDRs (commonly known as "black boxes") were required to be painted bright orange or bright yellow, making them easier to locate at a crash site.



Second-generation FDRs were introduced in the 1970s as the requirement to record more data increased, but they were unable to process the larger amounts of incoming sensor data. The solution was development of the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).



As shown in figure 2, the FDAU processes sensor data, then digitizes and formats it for transmission to the FDR. The second-generation digital FDR (DFDR) uses tape similar to audio recording tape. The tape is 300 to 500 ft long and can record up to 25 hr of data. It is stored in a cassette device mounted in a crash-protected enclosure.



FAA rule changes in the late 1980s required the first-generation FDRs to be replaced with digital recorders. Many of the older FDRs were replaced with second-generation magnetic tape recorders that can process incoming data without an FDAU. Most of these DFDRs can process up to 18 input parameters (signals). This requirement was based upon an airplane with four engines and a requirement to record 11 operational parameters for up to 25 hours (see "Parameters Explained" below).



Another FAA rule change that took effect October 11, 1991, led to the installation of digital FDAUs (DFDAUs) and DFDRs with solid-state memory on all Boeing airplanes before delivery. This FDR system was required to record a minimum of 34 parameter groups. The DFDAU processes approximately 100 different sensor signals per second for transmission to the DFDR, which uses electronics to accommodate data for a 25-hr period.



Today all Boeing current-production models use DFDR systems, which will store 64 12-bit words per second (wps) over a 25-hr period in electronic memory. At the end of the 25 hours, the DFDR will begin recording the most recent data over the oldest data. No tape removal is required with these systems. Each of these systems on every Boeing model (except the 777) have at least two data frames that are transmitted from the DFDAU to the DFDR (see "What Is a Data Frame?" below).



These separate data frames accommodate the different regulatory agency requirements. A 128-wps DFDR was available for the Boeing 777 and MD-90, allowing the development of one data frame that incorporated all regulatory agency requirements and that required operators to develop only one data frame decode algorithm. "How a FAA Rule Is Changed", below, explains the basis on which the FAA may propose rule changes.




Source





share











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
    $endgroup$
    – rghome
    16 hours ago






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    16 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    14 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    13 hours ago







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    13 hours ago



















15












$begingroup$


So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?




Absolutely not! Recorded data isn't just needed for flights that crash: there are plenty of cases where something bad happens in mid-air but the plane can still make a controlled landing, in one piece. Automatic erasure would mean you'd never have data from those incidents.



Rather, recordings are made on a loop. Originally, this would have been a looped tape; now it's digital memory. Once the memory is full, each new chunk of data overwrites the oldest stored data, so there is always a record of the last X amount of time.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62191%2fis-flight-data-recorder-erased-after-every-flight%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    21












    $begingroup$

    Flight data recorders have changed over the years and evolved to what they are today. Modern recorders are recording up to 88 parameters. The storage of the recorder is dependent on the range of the aircraft. Early recorders were using a circular tape that ran through the recorder. E.g. loop recording all the data and automatically overwriting the oldest data on the tape.



    The recorder of a Boeing 777 is based around modern solid state storage, capable of recording up to 25 hours continuously. Modern flight recorders are still recording continuously, so after the initial 25 hours, the storage is full. It will then start overwriting the oldest datablock stored. This ensures that you will always have the last 25 hours of data before a crash available for research.




    Flight data recorders were first introduced in the 1950s. Many first-generation FDRs used metal foil as the recording medium, with each single strip of foil capable of recording 200 to 400 hr of data. This metal foil was housed in a crash- survivable box installed in the aft end of an airplane. Beginning in 1965, FDRs (commonly known as "black boxes") were required to be painted bright orange or bright yellow, making them easier to locate at a crash site.



    Second-generation FDRs were introduced in the 1970s as the requirement to record more data increased, but they were unable to process the larger amounts of incoming sensor data. The solution was development of the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).



    As shown in figure 2, the FDAU processes sensor data, then digitizes and formats it for transmission to the FDR. The second-generation digital FDR (DFDR) uses tape similar to audio recording tape. The tape is 300 to 500 ft long and can record up to 25 hr of data. It is stored in a cassette device mounted in a crash-protected enclosure.



    FAA rule changes in the late 1980s required the first-generation FDRs to be replaced with digital recorders. Many of the older FDRs were replaced with second-generation magnetic tape recorders that can process incoming data without an FDAU. Most of these DFDRs can process up to 18 input parameters (signals). This requirement was based upon an airplane with four engines and a requirement to record 11 operational parameters for up to 25 hours (see "Parameters Explained" below).



    Another FAA rule change that took effect October 11, 1991, led to the installation of digital FDAUs (DFDAUs) and DFDRs with solid-state memory on all Boeing airplanes before delivery. This FDR system was required to record a minimum of 34 parameter groups. The DFDAU processes approximately 100 different sensor signals per second for transmission to the DFDR, which uses electronics to accommodate data for a 25-hr period.



    Today all Boeing current-production models use DFDR systems, which will store 64 12-bit words per second (wps) over a 25-hr period in electronic memory. At the end of the 25 hours, the DFDR will begin recording the most recent data over the oldest data. No tape removal is required with these systems. Each of these systems on every Boeing model (except the 777) have at least two data frames that are transmitted from the DFDAU to the DFDR (see "What Is a Data Frame?" below).



    These separate data frames accommodate the different regulatory agency requirements. A 128-wps DFDR was available for the Boeing 777 and MD-90, allowing the development of one data frame that incorporated all regulatory agency requirements and that required operators to develop only one data frame decode algorithm. "How a FAA Rule Is Changed", below, explains the basis on which the FAA may propose rule changes.




    Source





    share











    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
      $endgroup$
      – rghome
      16 hours ago






    • 16




      $begingroup$
      @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
      $endgroup$
      – David Richerby
      16 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      14 hours ago







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
      $endgroup$
      – T.J. Crowder
      13 hours ago







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      13 hours ago
















    21












    $begingroup$

    Flight data recorders have changed over the years and evolved to what they are today. Modern recorders are recording up to 88 parameters. The storage of the recorder is dependent on the range of the aircraft. Early recorders were using a circular tape that ran through the recorder. E.g. loop recording all the data and automatically overwriting the oldest data on the tape.



    The recorder of a Boeing 777 is based around modern solid state storage, capable of recording up to 25 hours continuously. Modern flight recorders are still recording continuously, so after the initial 25 hours, the storage is full. It will then start overwriting the oldest datablock stored. This ensures that you will always have the last 25 hours of data before a crash available for research.




    Flight data recorders were first introduced in the 1950s. Many first-generation FDRs used metal foil as the recording medium, with each single strip of foil capable of recording 200 to 400 hr of data. This metal foil was housed in a crash- survivable box installed in the aft end of an airplane. Beginning in 1965, FDRs (commonly known as "black boxes") were required to be painted bright orange or bright yellow, making them easier to locate at a crash site.



    Second-generation FDRs were introduced in the 1970s as the requirement to record more data increased, but they were unable to process the larger amounts of incoming sensor data. The solution was development of the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).



    As shown in figure 2, the FDAU processes sensor data, then digitizes and formats it for transmission to the FDR. The second-generation digital FDR (DFDR) uses tape similar to audio recording tape. The tape is 300 to 500 ft long and can record up to 25 hr of data. It is stored in a cassette device mounted in a crash-protected enclosure.



    FAA rule changes in the late 1980s required the first-generation FDRs to be replaced with digital recorders. Many of the older FDRs were replaced with second-generation magnetic tape recorders that can process incoming data without an FDAU. Most of these DFDRs can process up to 18 input parameters (signals). This requirement was based upon an airplane with four engines and a requirement to record 11 operational parameters for up to 25 hours (see "Parameters Explained" below).



    Another FAA rule change that took effect October 11, 1991, led to the installation of digital FDAUs (DFDAUs) and DFDRs with solid-state memory on all Boeing airplanes before delivery. This FDR system was required to record a minimum of 34 parameter groups. The DFDAU processes approximately 100 different sensor signals per second for transmission to the DFDR, which uses electronics to accommodate data for a 25-hr period.



    Today all Boeing current-production models use DFDR systems, which will store 64 12-bit words per second (wps) over a 25-hr period in electronic memory. At the end of the 25 hours, the DFDR will begin recording the most recent data over the oldest data. No tape removal is required with these systems. Each of these systems on every Boeing model (except the 777) have at least two data frames that are transmitted from the DFDAU to the DFDR (see "What Is a Data Frame?" below).



    These separate data frames accommodate the different regulatory agency requirements. A 128-wps DFDR was available for the Boeing 777 and MD-90, allowing the development of one data frame that incorporated all regulatory agency requirements and that required operators to develop only one data frame decode algorithm. "How a FAA Rule Is Changed", below, explains the basis on which the FAA may propose rule changes.




    Source





    share











    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
      $endgroup$
      – rghome
      16 hours ago






    • 16




      $begingroup$
      @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
      $endgroup$
      – David Richerby
      16 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      14 hours ago







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
      $endgroup$
      – T.J. Crowder
      13 hours ago







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      13 hours ago














    21












    21








    21





    $begingroup$

    Flight data recorders have changed over the years and evolved to what they are today. Modern recorders are recording up to 88 parameters. The storage of the recorder is dependent on the range of the aircraft. Early recorders were using a circular tape that ran through the recorder. E.g. loop recording all the data and automatically overwriting the oldest data on the tape.



    The recorder of a Boeing 777 is based around modern solid state storage, capable of recording up to 25 hours continuously. Modern flight recorders are still recording continuously, so after the initial 25 hours, the storage is full. It will then start overwriting the oldest datablock stored. This ensures that you will always have the last 25 hours of data before a crash available for research.




    Flight data recorders were first introduced in the 1950s. Many first-generation FDRs used metal foil as the recording medium, with each single strip of foil capable of recording 200 to 400 hr of data. This metal foil was housed in a crash- survivable box installed in the aft end of an airplane. Beginning in 1965, FDRs (commonly known as "black boxes") were required to be painted bright orange or bright yellow, making them easier to locate at a crash site.



    Second-generation FDRs were introduced in the 1970s as the requirement to record more data increased, but they were unable to process the larger amounts of incoming sensor data. The solution was development of the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).



    As shown in figure 2, the FDAU processes sensor data, then digitizes and formats it for transmission to the FDR. The second-generation digital FDR (DFDR) uses tape similar to audio recording tape. The tape is 300 to 500 ft long and can record up to 25 hr of data. It is stored in a cassette device mounted in a crash-protected enclosure.



    FAA rule changes in the late 1980s required the first-generation FDRs to be replaced with digital recorders. Many of the older FDRs were replaced with second-generation magnetic tape recorders that can process incoming data without an FDAU. Most of these DFDRs can process up to 18 input parameters (signals). This requirement was based upon an airplane with four engines and a requirement to record 11 operational parameters for up to 25 hours (see "Parameters Explained" below).



    Another FAA rule change that took effect October 11, 1991, led to the installation of digital FDAUs (DFDAUs) and DFDRs with solid-state memory on all Boeing airplanes before delivery. This FDR system was required to record a minimum of 34 parameter groups. The DFDAU processes approximately 100 different sensor signals per second for transmission to the DFDR, which uses electronics to accommodate data for a 25-hr period.



    Today all Boeing current-production models use DFDR systems, which will store 64 12-bit words per second (wps) over a 25-hr period in electronic memory. At the end of the 25 hours, the DFDR will begin recording the most recent data over the oldest data. No tape removal is required with these systems. Each of these systems on every Boeing model (except the 777) have at least two data frames that are transmitted from the DFDAU to the DFDR (see "What Is a Data Frame?" below).



    These separate data frames accommodate the different regulatory agency requirements. A 128-wps DFDR was available for the Boeing 777 and MD-90, allowing the development of one data frame that incorporated all regulatory agency requirements and that required operators to develop only one data frame decode algorithm. "How a FAA Rule Is Changed", below, explains the basis on which the FAA may propose rule changes.




    Source





    share











    $endgroup$



    Flight data recorders have changed over the years and evolved to what they are today. Modern recorders are recording up to 88 parameters. The storage of the recorder is dependent on the range of the aircraft. Early recorders were using a circular tape that ran through the recorder. E.g. loop recording all the data and automatically overwriting the oldest data on the tape.



    The recorder of a Boeing 777 is based around modern solid state storage, capable of recording up to 25 hours continuously. Modern flight recorders are still recording continuously, so after the initial 25 hours, the storage is full. It will then start overwriting the oldest datablock stored. This ensures that you will always have the last 25 hours of data before a crash available for research.




    Flight data recorders were first introduced in the 1950s. Many first-generation FDRs used metal foil as the recording medium, with each single strip of foil capable of recording 200 to 400 hr of data. This metal foil was housed in a crash- survivable box installed in the aft end of an airplane. Beginning in 1965, FDRs (commonly known as "black boxes") were required to be painted bright orange or bright yellow, making them easier to locate at a crash site.



    Second-generation FDRs were introduced in the 1970s as the requirement to record more data increased, but they were unable to process the larger amounts of incoming sensor data. The solution was development of the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).



    As shown in figure 2, the FDAU processes sensor data, then digitizes and formats it for transmission to the FDR. The second-generation digital FDR (DFDR) uses tape similar to audio recording tape. The tape is 300 to 500 ft long and can record up to 25 hr of data. It is stored in a cassette device mounted in a crash-protected enclosure.



    FAA rule changes in the late 1980s required the first-generation FDRs to be replaced with digital recorders. Many of the older FDRs were replaced with second-generation magnetic tape recorders that can process incoming data without an FDAU. Most of these DFDRs can process up to 18 input parameters (signals). This requirement was based upon an airplane with four engines and a requirement to record 11 operational parameters for up to 25 hours (see "Parameters Explained" below).



    Another FAA rule change that took effect October 11, 1991, led to the installation of digital FDAUs (DFDAUs) and DFDRs with solid-state memory on all Boeing airplanes before delivery. This FDR system was required to record a minimum of 34 parameter groups. The DFDAU processes approximately 100 different sensor signals per second for transmission to the DFDR, which uses electronics to accommodate data for a 25-hr period.



    Today all Boeing current-production models use DFDR systems, which will store 64 12-bit words per second (wps) over a 25-hr period in electronic memory. At the end of the 25 hours, the DFDR will begin recording the most recent data over the oldest data. No tape removal is required with these systems. Each of these systems on every Boeing model (except the 777) have at least two data frames that are transmitted from the DFDAU to the DFDR (see "What Is a Data Frame?" below).



    These separate data frames accommodate the different regulatory agency requirements. A 128-wps DFDR was available for the Boeing 777 and MD-90, allowing the development of one data frame that incorporated all regulatory agency requirements and that required operators to develop only one data frame decode algorithm. "How a FAA Rule Is Changed", below, explains the basis on which the FAA may propose rule changes.




    Source






    share













    share


    share








    edited 12 hours ago

























    answered 19 hours ago









    BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje

    3,14121334




    3,14121334







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
      $endgroup$
      – rghome
      16 hours ago






    • 16




      $begingroup$
      @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
      $endgroup$
      – David Richerby
      16 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      14 hours ago







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
      $endgroup$
      – T.J. Crowder
      13 hours ago







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      13 hours ago













    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
      $endgroup$
      – rghome
      16 hours ago






    • 16




      $begingroup$
      @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
      $endgroup$
      – David Richerby
      16 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      14 hours ago







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
      $endgroup$
      – T.J. Crowder
      13 hours ago







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
      $endgroup$
      – JoL
      13 hours ago








    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
    $endgroup$
    – rghome
    16 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Makes me wonder what kind of ancient memory technology they are using. 64 x 12 bit words per second for 25 hours is not even 10MB.
    $endgroup$
    – rghome
    16 hours ago




    16




    16




    $begingroup$
    @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    16 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @rghome Remember that reliability is of extreme concern, and that includes reliability after being lost in the ocean for a few years. There aren't many situations in which you'd need more than 25hrs worth of data, and 64 parameters once a second is enough to store most of what's needed.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    16 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    14 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder The first paragraph says, "After these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint." That tells us that it's not totally erased after every flight, but rather partially erased on every time interval it records a new datapoint, to always have 25 hours of recorded data.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    14 hours ago





    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    13 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @JoL - No, it doesn't tell me that. It tells me that if it's not erased, it will start overwriting after 25 hours. It doesn't tell me that it's not erased. (This isn't pedantry. I genuinely couldn't tell from the answer whether the common practice was to erase them or not. David Richerby's answer is quite clear on that point.)
    $endgroup$
    – T.J. Crowder
    13 hours ago





    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    13 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @T.J.Crowder I see. I was looking at this question from the angle that the data needed to be erased to free up storage space, and so how is it erased? after every flight? Since "after these 25 hours it will start overwriting the oldest datapoint" solves that, I didn't see any reason why there would be any other type of erasure, and took that sentence as saying there wouldn't be. If there is any other motivation for erasing the data, I suppose you're right that this answer isn't explicit on that point.
    $endgroup$
    – JoL
    13 hours ago












    15












    $begingroup$


    So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?




    Absolutely not! Recorded data isn't just needed for flights that crash: there are plenty of cases where something bad happens in mid-air but the plane can still make a controlled landing, in one piece. Automatic erasure would mean you'd never have data from those incidents.



    Rather, recordings are made on a loop. Originally, this would have been a looped tape; now it's digital memory. Once the memory is full, each new chunk of data overwrites the oldest stored data, so there is always a record of the last X amount of time.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      15












      $begingroup$


      So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?




      Absolutely not! Recorded data isn't just needed for flights that crash: there are plenty of cases where something bad happens in mid-air but the plane can still make a controlled landing, in one piece. Automatic erasure would mean you'd never have data from those incidents.



      Rather, recordings are made on a loop. Originally, this would have been a looped tape; now it's digital memory. Once the memory is full, each new chunk of data overwrites the oldest stored data, so there is always a record of the last X amount of time.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        15












        15








        15





        $begingroup$


        So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?




        Absolutely not! Recorded data isn't just needed for flights that crash: there are plenty of cases where something bad happens in mid-air but the plane can still make a controlled landing, in one piece. Automatic erasure would mean you'd never have data from those incidents.



        Rather, recordings are made on a loop. Originally, this would have been a looped tape; now it's digital memory. Once the memory is full, each new chunk of data overwrites the oldest stored data, so there is always a record of the last X amount of time.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        So, is a flight data recorder erased after every flight? If so, after how long and by whom, is it automatic on landing, engine shutdown or it's one of the pilots procedures on landing?




        Absolutely not! Recorded data isn't just needed for flights that crash: there are plenty of cases where something bad happens in mid-air but the plane can still make a controlled landing, in one piece. Automatic erasure would mean you'd never have data from those incidents.



        Rather, recordings are made on a loop. Originally, this would have been a looped tape; now it's digital memory. Once the memory is full, each new chunk of data overwrites the oldest stored data, so there is always a record of the last X amount of time.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 18 hours ago









        David RicherbyDavid Richerby

        10.3k33579




        10.3k33579



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62191%2fis-flight-data-recorder-erased-after-every-flight%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to make RAID controller rescan devices The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i: Disk isn't recognized after replacementHow to monitor the hard disk status behind Dell PERC H710 Raid Controller with CentOS 6?LSI MegaRAID - Recreate missing RAID 1 arrayext. 2-bay USB-Drive with RAID: btrfs RAID vs built-in RAIDInvalid SAS topologyDoes enabling JBOD mode on LSI based controllers affect existing logical disks/arrays?Why is there a shift between the WWN reported from the controller and the Linux system?Optimal RAID 6+0 Setup for 40+ 4TB DisksAccidental SAS cable removal

            Куамањотепек (Чилапа де Алварез) Садржај Становништво Види још Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију17°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.0308317°19′47″N 99°1′51″W / 17.32972° СГШ; 99.03083° ЗГД / 17.32972; -99.030838877656„Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía”„The GeoNames geographical database”Мексичка насељапроширитиуу

            Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the altitude of a satellite defined, given that the Earth is not spherical?Why do satellites appear to move faster when overhead and slower closer to the horizon?For the mathematical relationship between J2 (km^5/s^2) and dimensionless J2 - which one is derived from the other?Why is Nodal precession affected by the rotational period of the planet?Why is it so difficult to predict the exact reentry location and time of a very low earth orbit object?Why are low earth orbit satellites not visible from the same place all the time?Perifocal coordinates and the orbit equationHow feasible is the Moonspike mission?What was the typical perigee after a shuttle de-orbit burn?I am having trouble calculating my classic orbital elements and am at a loss on where to lookAm I supposed to modify the gravitational constant with scale and why do fps & time scale changes cause my orbit to break?How Local time of a sun synchronous orbit is related to Right ascension of ascending node?What is wrong with my orbit sim equations? How can I fix them?How to obtain the initial positions and velocities of an inclined orbit?